This article provide you information about the failed cooperation in Viprinet GmbH that took the Simon Kissel as an occasion to commit himself to the GERES Group, their workers and the management.Simon Kissel propagated the allegations related to his former management and about his behavior as a co-owner of the former Viprinet GmbH. Mr. Kissel was part of Viprinet GmbH combined with Felix B. and two other companies.
The courts evaluated their activities as managing directors of the former Viprinet GmbH not only as self-serving and unacceptable, but also as unfaithful. The judgments of the court confirmed an uncompromising pursuit of his own interests as managing director of the former Viprinet GmbH.The Oberlandesgericht Koblenz also confirmed the dismissal of S. Kissel as Managing Director of Viprinet GmbH on the basis of breaching the law.Due to this reason Simon Kissel was noticed by his co-owners in the Viprinet GmbH by breaching the law of the company that was also shown by another court ruling from Mainz, in which the dismissal of Simon Kissel as Managing Director of Computerman GmbH was confirmed. His self-serving activitiesin which he disregarded the benefits of the companies and his co-owners, wereobjected by the district court of Mainz.These evaluations of the court confirmed that Simon Kissel's own benefits were rigorously pursued, even though these evaluationsthat has been shown, lead to irregularities.
Due to this turmoil of the facts that it becomes clear that he used the company's assets for his own interests because these were his personal advantages and as a result led to the disadvantages for his partners.The jointly established market entry of this company in international market was fleetingly twisted by Kissel in a one-sided effort to sell the company, or in his own words extremely dramatically "a hostile takeover". It is also obvious here that he has pushed forward the discussions and foundations of the companies.
Simon Kissel felt himself justified in using all the resources, which were also tremendously questionable in the rule of law. In the quest of his personal power and his own benefit, Simon Kissel went into the war that was declared by him contrary to his longtime personal patrons and his co-owners, even though he had a personal loan for instance in the view of the sluggish company development and the compelling capital increases for the former Viprinet GmbH Of the GERES Group, thus avoiding the attenuation of its shares. Due to which sales were still going down.